MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/List of Play Nintendo opinion polls: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{UNFANOMSTAT
|nominated=14:53, April 29, 2024 (EDT)
|nominated=14:53, April 29, 2024 (EDT)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|passed=21:11, April 29, 2024 (EDT)
}}
}}
==== Remove featured article status ====
==== Remove featured article status ====
Line 11: Line 11:
#{{User|Sparks}} Per all.
#{{User|Sparks}} Per all.
#{{User|Scrooge200}} Per all, but I'm wondering if we could nominate one of the pages this was split off to instead. The lists are still very exhaustive and high quality, especially for such a niche thing about the franchise, so it'd be cool to give them some recognition.
#{{User|Scrooge200}} Per all, but I'm wondering if we could nominate one of the pages this was split off to instead. The lists are still very exhaustive and high quality, especially for such a niche thing about the franchise, so it'd be cool to give them some recognition.
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} Agree.


==== Keep featured article status ====
==== Keep featured article status ====

Revision as of 18:19, April 29, 2024

List of Play Nintendo opinion polls

Remove featured article status

  1. Hewer (talk) This article had its contents split into other articles in December 2023, and is now just a four-sentence blurb, an icon, and a list of links. It now certainly fails the "reasonable length" and "complete list entries" featured article requirements, and it still being featured is probably just an oversight from when the page was split.
  2. Koopa con Carne (talk) As the user who proposed to have the page featured... *sob* *sniff* *sobs harder*
  3. Camwoodstock (talk) ...Wait, seriously??? Yeah, this probably should've lost its feature in the split.
  4. Sparks (talk) Per all.
  5. Scrooge200 (talk) Per all, but I'm wondering if we could nominate one of the pages this was split off to instead. The lists are still very exhaustive and high quality, especially for such a niche thing about the franchise, so it'd be cool to give them some recognition.
  6. Archivist Toadette (talk) Agree.

Keep featured article status

Removal of support/oppose votes

Comments