User talk:L151
Welcome to my talk page, please remember to insert your signature property after leaving a message. Thank you!
| Please visit my archives |
|---|
|
|
Talk archived without an answer?
I don't want to sound rude, but I see you didn't even make an effort of deleting Tuff let alone answer my talk after Ultimate Mr. L (in the RE:New stub section). 
Yoshi the SSM (talk) 20:12, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
- Ah that's good. I think. I don't exactly know what to say, as (if you don't know this already) Ultimate Mr. L created Tuff about the same time as Websterite (I know this since I saw the two created). So, I kind of see those two together (as in either both should keep or both should be deleted) because of that reason. No response to the other part: this is totally fine if you don't want to talk about it. As for Doc's comment, I was writing a response at the same time I noticed you answered me. As such, it is written if it was to him only. But the principle still applies. I respect you.
Yoshi the SSM (talk) 20:56, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
Old Pink Beezo image
Hi, I found a link to this on here, and it seemed you deleted it a while back due to being "unused." Any chance you could restore it? I'm interested in how it looks, and it should probably be added to the gallery, unless it's a duplicate. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 23:19, 19 April 2018 (EDT)
- On a related note, can you also restore this? It's mentioned in the summary section of one of the aforementioned images, so it can just be added to the Doki Doki Panic gallery so it won't be considered unused. LinkTheLefty (talk) 10:53, 23 April 2018 (EDT)
Luigi's Girlfriend vandal
Culprit found, they seem to want to strike again. What should we do? Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 19:36, 29 April 2018 (EDT)
- Been discussed on discord. Just block them should it happen again, like any other vandal.
19:44, 29 April 2018 (EDT)
Recent log deletion
Hi, just wanted to know why you hid both the username and the block summary in the most recent block. IMO, it's not like the name of the blocking administrator necessarily needs to be hidden so long as the blocked username is hidden. As for the summary, please feel free to let me know if it was something other than "Unacceptable username", otherwise IMHO that doesn't need to be hidden either.
(This is by no means saying you have to do this, just something I've noticed and want to at least be taken into consideration.)
