9,633
edits
Line 472: | Line 472: | ||
:::How about we use {{tem|game infobox}} instead of <nowiki>{{DLC infobox}}</nowiki>? Would that be a better idea? {{User:GuntherBB/sig}} 22:44, May 14, 2024 (EDT) | :::How about we use {{tem|game infobox}} instead of <nowiki>{{DLC infobox}}</nowiki>? Would that be a better idea? {{User:GuntherBB/sig}} 22:44, May 14, 2024 (EDT) | ||
::::You still misunderstand, no one in these comments is against the DLC infobox idea. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 03:04, May 15, 2024 (EDT) | ::::You still misunderstand, no one in these comments is against the DLC infobox idea. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 03:04, May 15, 2024 (EDT) | ||
I'm starting to feel that GuntherBayBee is posing these questions purely to drum up more engagement in his proposals. It's not exactly the same as [[Special:Diff/4161234|stating to think about voting for an option they already voted for from the beginning]] or [[Special:Diff/4166018|literally asking people that engaged in the comments what option they're voting for]], but in all cases, it was preceded by a lack of engagement in his proposal (although, in this case, it's more because this proposal is sandwiched inbetween several proposals with way more engagement than one could wish for). I would otherwise have no idea why he's trying to bargain different ideas when people are literally ''unanimously agreeing with his DLC infobox idea'' (with not a single opposing vote so far), unless he's ''really bad'' at reading. {{User:Arend/sig}} 10:38, May 15, 2024 (EDT) | |||
===Split the Super Mario universe and the Paper Mario universe=== | ===Split the Super Mario universe and the Paper Mario universe=== |