Talk:Elevator Key: Difference between revisions

Line 80: Line 80:
Should the above proposal that merged the pages have passed in the first place? There are only three votes, and [[MarioWiki:Proposals]] states that "Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." --{{User:TheFlameChomp/sig}} 16:38, 16 August 2017 (EDT)
Should the above proposal that merged the pages have passed in the first place? There are only three votes, and [[MarioWiki:Proposals]] states that "Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." --{{User:TheFlameChomp/sig}} 16:38, 16 August 2017 (EDT)
:[[Talk:Gabon#Merge_to_Spike_.28enemy.29|It's not the only proposal]] like that (and that rule was there since 2007). I'm not sure if it's too late to do something about it, but at the very least, this proposal will settle things properly for the Elevator Key proposal. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 16:41, 16 August 2017 (EDT)
:[[Talk:Gabon#Merge_to_Spike_.28enemy.29|It's not the only proposal]] like that (and that rule was there since 2007). I'm not sure if it's too late to do something about it, but at the very least, this proposal will settle things properly for the Elevator Key proposal. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 16:41, 16 August 2017 (EDT)
== The name of the elevator key in the Japanese version of the game ==
For anyone familiar with the Japanese language, [http://i.imgur.com/21HCIDE.png here is the name of the item in that language]. Yes, both keycards and the normal key share the same name.--{{User:Megadardery/sig}} 19:43, 17 August 2017 (EDT)
13,961

edits