Talk:Princess Peach: Showtime!: Difference between revisions

→‎Replace the level list on the main Princess Peach: Showtime! page with a link to, or incorporation of, the Sparkle Theater page: And he never managed to revise the proposal to let us choose between his proposed options anyway 😭
(→‎Replace the level list on the main Princess Peach: Showtime! page with a link to, or incorporation of, the Sparkle Theater page: And he never managed to revise the proposal to let us choose between his proposed options anyway 😭)
(22 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
::::::I think I would say yes, so I am not sure it will count as references because everytime we also heard. Also, most of the people heard if it is related to Super Mario Galaxy or Mario Kart 8 Deluxe motifs. -- [[User:ExoRosalina|ExoRosalina]] ([[User talk:ExoRosalina|talk]]) 5:41, March 31, 2024 (PST)
::::::I think I would say yes, so I am not sure it will count as references because everytime we also heard. Also, most of the people heard if it is related to Super Mario Galaxy or Mario Kart 8 Deluxe motifs. -- [[User:ExoRosalina|ExoRosalina]] ([[User talk:ExoRosalina|talk]]) 5:41, March 31, 2024 (PST)
:::::::I don't think that the transformations sharing jingles is related to the Super Mario World levels sharing jingles. A lot of games have the same themes for levels, so I don't think it's notable enough to add. -- {{User:FanOfRosalina2007/sig}} 22:13, March 30, 2024 (EDT)
:::::::I don't think that the transformations sharing jingles is related to the Super Mario World levels sharing jingles. A lot of games have the same themes for levels, so I don't think it's notable enough to add. -- {{User:FanOfRosalina2007/sig}} 22:13, March 30, 2024 (EDT)
::::::::That is correct, because I never stated they are related. I used Super Mario World as an example because people know that the levels share the similar melody, same with Super Mario 64 levels. The whole point I am stating is that Peach's transformations share the same melodies in their themes, while they are modified from one another. {{User:Derekblue1/sig}} 21:27, April 3, 2024 (EDT)


==Last four transformations?==
==Last four transformations?==
Line 74: Line 75:


I've personally played through the entire game in English, with the system region set to Europe, and I can confirm first-hand that the game consistently uses only American spellings. As such, I presume the <code>en_gb=y</code> part in the infobox should likely be removed. [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 02:55, April 2, 2024 (EDT)
I've personally played through the entire game in English, with the system region set to Europe, and I can confirm first-hand that the game consistently uses only American spellings. As such, I presume the <code>en_gb=y</code> part in the infobox should likely be removed. [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 02:55, April 2, 2024 (EDT)
== Anyone up for expanding? ==
Okay, let me get this clear: '''the "enemies and obstacles" section needs severe expanding!!!''' The game already came out a few weeks ago, and I really, REALLY think the "enemies and obstacles" should be expanded from the so little it covers now. PLEASE do this! {{User:Mariofan28047/sig}} 15:55, April 5, 2024 (EDT)
:Because the game just came out, many people are still playing the game. As a result, it might be a while before the "Enemies and obstacles" section is complete. If you wish, you could help expand it if you own the game. -- {{User:FanOfRosalina2007/sig}} 14:35, April 14, 2024 (EDT)
::Don't worry - I'll help! I'll add the enemies and bosses I've uploaded images for. {{User:Sparks/sig}} 14:37, April 14, 2024 (EDT)
:::In my eyes personally, [[Princess Peach: Showtime!#Characters]] already has a massive overweight of antagonists contra protagonists (21 to 4), so I'm thinking that there'd be more reason to add more friendly characters, than to add enemy characters. [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 01:32, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
== Ancient language ==
Can we add a alphabet for the in game ancient language [[Special:Contributions/174.242.40.57|174.242.40.57]] 12:45, April 6, 2024 (EDT)
:Presuming it's about the stone exhibitions in [[The Case of the Missing Mural]], I personally think it'd be impractical at best, even more so as there's no sounds associated with those letters. Same unfortunately goes for what is apparently the [[Theet]]s' current-day written language, which is used in e.g. the newspaper Peach reads in [[The Case of the Rainy-Day Plot]], and in some of Sparkle Theater's posters. [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 11:14, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
==Replace the level list on the main Princess Peach: Showtime! page with a link to, or incorporation of, the Sparkle Theater page==
{{SettledTPP}}
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|0-6}}
The edit in question would be big enough that it'd likely raise eyebrows if I had done it with no forewarning, so it likely warrants a talk page proposal instead:
Essentially, the level list at [[Princess Peach: Showtime!#Plays]], has been completely outclassed in info and details by the level list at [[Sparkle Theater]], and more info may well be added to the latter page at a later time.
As a result of that, the former's list as it currently stands, does not make sense in my eyes to keep in the state it is at the time of writing (A simple table with floors and level names).
There's only two options I can personally vouch for, which are pretty similar to each other:
===Option 1: Replace the entire Showtime page's list with a link to Sparkle Theater===
This is one I know from Wikipedia, which has a concept of "Main article:". The way I think of it, the entire "Plays" section would be replaced with a "Main article:", for example, if I remember Wikipedia's syntaxing correctly:
<code><nowiki>==Plays==</nowiki></code><br>
<code><nowiki>{{Main|Sparkle Theater}}</nowiki></code><br><br>
And maybe one or two images like e.g. [[:File:PPS Sparkle Theater 1F.png]] on its right.
===Option 2: Also center the list around a link to Sparkle Theater, but with some more text summaries and images added to Showtime's list===
This one is a bit more abstract to explain. The same <code><nowiki>{{Main|Sparkle Theater}}</nowiki></code> as in Option 1 would be placed on the top of the section, but the current list would be allowed to remain, along with some text above the list that would say something like "''Princess Peach: Showtime'' has 40 levels in total, with Sparkle Theater being the hub between them. The five main floors contain a shows with a rotation of with different transformations, while the basement contains the third and final levels for each transformation." As well as two- or three-ish images on the right.
'''Proposer''': {{User|DandelionSprout}}<br>
'''Deadline''': May 10, 2024, 23:59 GMT
====Support====
#{{User|DandelionSprout}} The current list just looks too simple, compared to the very detailed list on the Sparkle Theater page.
====Oppose====
#{{User|Nightwicked Bowser}} Game articles typically include full level lists regardless if there are other articles that list them, including all Super Mario platformer articles.
#{{User|ExoRosalina}} Is this even necessary? Some plays have better options just like in other platformer pages. I have yet checked Super Mario Galaxy (including 2) have both levels and Galaxy page have those similar issues.
#{{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} Per above. Also, there is no option choosing.
#{{User|Power Flotzo}} Per all.
#{{User|FanOfRosalina2007}} Per all.
#{{User|EvieMaybe}} if this passed, would we also take the levels out of SM3DW's page and put them in the sprixie kingdom page?
====Comments====
Uhhh, this proposal doesn't let you choose which option they want. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&#38;K(B&#38;ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&#38;K(B&#38;ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&#38;K(B&#38;ATSA)|talk]]) 08:15, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
:I had to guess a fair bit for what the format for my first ever talk page proposal would be, and [[MarioWiki:Proposals#Basic_proposal_and_support.2Foppose_format]] didn't seem to account for multi-option procedures, sadly. 😓 [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 11:09, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
::You don't have to keep the format as provided on the Proposals page word-for-word: you can change a few things that befit your proposal better as you set it up. Looking at previous multiple-option proposals, for example, you can replace the Support and Oppose sections with an "Option 1" section, an "Option 2" section, and a "Do nothing" section. {{User:Arend/sig}} 12:07, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
:::Yeah, you don't HAVE to. When I make multi-option proposals, I put in the initial format, then change it to fit the proposal. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&#38;K(B&#38;ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&#38;K(B&#38;ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&#38;K(B&#38;ATSA)|talk]]) 13:49, April 26, 2024 (EDT)