MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/List of Play Nintendo opinion polls: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:49, May 10, 2024

Hewer (talk) This article had its contents split into other articles in December 2023, and is now just a four-sentence blurb, an icon, and a list of links. It now certainly fails the "reasonable length" and "complete list entries" featured article requirements, and it still being featured is probably just an oversight from when the page was split.
Koopa con Carne (talk) As the user who proposed to have the page featured... *sob* *sniff* *sobs harder*
Camwoodstock (talk) ...Wait, seriously??? Yeah, this probably should've lost its feature in the split.
Sparks (talk) Per all.
Scrooge200 (talk) Per all, but I'm wondering if we could nominate one of the pages this was split off to instead. The lists are still very exhaustive and high quality, especially for such a niche thing about the franchise, so it'd be cool to give them some recognition.
Archivist Toadette (talk) Agree.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 __NOTOC__
 ===[[List of Play Nintendo opinion polls]]===
-{{UNFANOMSTAT
+{{Fa-archive
+|unfeature=yes
 |nominated=14:53, April 29, 2024 (EDT)
-|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
+|passed=21:11, April 29, 2024 (EDT)
 }}
 ==== Remove featured article status ====
@@ Line 10: / Line 11: @@
 #{{User|Camwoodstock}} ...Wait, seriously??? Yeah, this probably should've lost its feature in the split.
 #{{User|Sparks}} Per all.
+#{{User|Scrooge200}} Per all, but I'm wondering if we could nominate one of the pages this was split off to instead. The lists are still very exhaustive and high quality, especially for such a niche thing about the franchise, so it'd be cool to give them some recognition.
+#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} Agree.
 ==== Keep featured article status ====