389,056
edits
Mario Party Advance: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "''Mario'' " to "''Super Mario'' "
m (Text replacement - "{{Mario games}}" to "{{Super Mario games}}") |
m (Text replacement - "''Mario'' " to "''Super Mario'' ") |
||
| Line 449: | Line 449: | ||
In an IGN article ranking the ''[[Mario Party (series)|Mario Party]]'' games, ''Mario Party Advance'' came in last (out of twelve games), being described as "the black sheep of the ''Mario Party'' series."<ref>Koczwara, Micheal (March 23, 2015). [http://ign.com/articles/the-best-mario-party-games The Best ''Mario Party'' Games]. ''IGN''. Retrieved May 22, 2017.</ref> It was also brought up in a review for ''[[Mario Party DS]]'' in reference to handheld ''Mario Party'' games, describing it as "one of the lamest iterations of the series."<ref>Harris, Craig (November 21, 2007). [http://ign.com/articles/2007/11/21/mario-party-ds-review ''Mario Party DS'' Review]. ''IGN''. Retrieved May 22, 2017.</ref> | In an IGN article ranking the ''[[Mario Party (series)|Mario Party]]'' games, ''Mario Party Advance'' came in last (out of twelve games), being described as "the black sheep of the ''Mario Party'' series."<ref>Koczwara, Micheal (March 23, 2015). [http://ign.com/articles/the-best-mario-party-games The Best ''Mario Party'' Games]. ''IGN''. Retrieved May 22, 2017.</ref> It was also brought up in a review for ''[[Mario Party DS]]'' in reference to handheld ''Mario Party'' games, describing it as "one of the lamest iterations of the series."<ref>Harris, Craig (November 21, 2007). [http://ign.com/articles/2007/11/21/mario-party-ds-review ''Mario Party DS'' Review]. ''IGN''. Retrieved May 22, 2017.</ref> | ||
The game received the title of the "Worst-received ''Mario'' videogame" from the ''[[Guinness World Records]]'', deriving its results from GameRankings as of July 28, 2014.<ref>[http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/search/applicationrecordsearch?term=%22worst-rated+Mario+videogame%22&contentType=record Guiness World Records search results]. ''guinnessworldrecords.com''. Retrieved May 22, 2017.</ref> Similarly, ''Mario Party Advance'' holds the third-lowest Metacritic Metascore in the entire ''Mario'' franchise, at 54,<ref>[https://www.metacritic.com/game/game-boy-advance/mario-party-advance ''Mario Party Advance'' Metacritic page]. Accessed August 7, 2020.</ref> with the second-lowest being ''[[WarioWare: Snapped!]]'' (at 53)<ref>[https://www.metacritic.com/game/ds/warioware-snapped! ''WarioWare: Snapped!'' Metacritic page]. Accessed August 7, 2020.</ref> and the lowest being ''[[Donkey Kong Barrel Blast]]'' (at 46).<ref>[https://www.metacritic.com/game/wii/donkey-kong-barrel-blast ''Donkey Kong Barrel Blast'' Metacritic page]. Accessed February 3, 2021.</ref> | The game received the title of the "Worst-received ''Super Mario'' videogame" from the ''[[Guinness World Records]]'', deriving its results from GameRankings as of July 28, 2014.<ref>[http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/search/applicationrecordsearch?term=%22worst-rated+Mario+videogame%22&contentType=record Guiness World Records search results]. ''guinnessworldrecords.com''. Retrieved May 22, 2017.</ref> Similarly, ''Mario Party Advance'' holds the third-lowest Metacritic Metascore in the entire ''Super Mario'' franchise, at 54,<ref>[https://www.metacritic.com/game/game-boy-advance/mario-party-advance ''Mario Party Advance'' Metacritic page]. Accessed August 7, 2020.</ref> with the second-lowest being ''[[WarioWare: Snapped!]]'' (at 53)<ref>[https://www.metacritic.com/game/ds/warioware-snapped! ''WarioWare: Snapped!'' Metacritic page]. Accessed August 7, 2020.</ref> and the lowest being ''[[Donkey Kong Barrel Blast]]'' (at 46).<ref>[https://www.metacritic.com/game/wii/donkey-kong-barrel-blast ''Donkey Kong Barrel Blast'' Metacritic page]. Accessed February 3, 2021.</ref> | ||
{|class="wikitable review_template"cellpadding="4"style="width:100%; text-align:center; border:2px solid black; margin-bottom:5px" | {|class="wikitable review_template"cellpadding="4"style="width:100%; text-align:center; border:2px solid black; margin-bottom:5px" | ||
!colspan="4"style="font-size:120%; text-align: center; background-color:silver"|Reviews | !colspan="4"style="font-size:120%; text-align: center; background-color:silver"|Reviews | ||